Published on:

Hotel Labor and Employment Lawyer Update: Controversial Union Rights Notice Subject to Legal Challenge — Employers Should Not Rush To Post It

20 September 2011

On September 10 2011 , we let you know that the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) is making it harder to stay union free.

As of November 14, 2011, most private sector employers are required, by a controversial new National Labor Relations Board rule, to post a notice advising employees of their rights under the National Labor Relations Act.

Now, according to my partner, labor and employment lawyer Scott Brink, the NLRB’s authority to issue the new rule is already the subject of legal challenge.

Because NLRB enforcement of the new rule may be delayed — pending the resolution of a lawsuit challenging the validity of the rule — employers should not rush to post the notice before the November 14, 2011 deadline.

Scott’s brief article below explains what is going on and why you need to pay attention to this important development.

A link to the NLRB’s Form of Notice, which was issued September 14, 2011, may be found at the end of the article.




Labor Law Update: Controversial Union Rights Notice
Now Available From Labor Board — Employers Should Not Rush To Post
by

Scott Brink | Hotel Lawyer, JMBM Global Hospitality Group®

As of November 14, 2011, most private sector employers are required, by a controversial new National Labor Relations Board rule, to post a notice advising employees of their rights under the National Labor Relations Act. A link to the Form of Notice, which was issued on September 14, 2011, may be found at the end of this article.

This new rule requires employers to post an 11 x 17 inch notice in a conspicuous place where other notifications of workplace rights and employer rules and policies are posted. In addition, employers who post personnel policies or workplace notices to internal or external websites are required to post the notice on those sites. The NLRB has stated that failure to properly post the notice may toll statutes of limitations on unfair labor practice charges and may itself be an unfair labor practice.

Employers should not rush to post the notice prior to November 14, as the NLRB’s authority to issue the new rule is already the subject of legal challenge. NLRB enforcement of the new rule may be delayed, pending the resolution of a lawsuit challenging the validity of the rule.

The NLRB’s authority to issue the new rule is questionable. While the Act does authorize the NLRB to enforce its provisions, nothing in it specifically authorizes the NLRB to require employers to post notices if they are not involved in representation cases or unfair labor proceedings.

Employer organizations and business groups have criticized the new rule and the content of the notice on the grounds that it improperly fosters union organizing. The NLRB’s form of notice advises employees that they have the right to:

  • Organize a union to negotiate with their employer concerning their wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment.
  • Form, join or assist a union.
  • Bargain collectively through representatives of employees’ own choosing for a contract with their employer setting their wages, benefits, hours, and other working conditions.
  • Discuss their wages and benefits and other terms and conditions of employment or union organizing with their co-workers or a union.
  • Take action with one or more co-workers to improve their working conditions by, among other means, raising work-related complaints directly with their employer or with a government agency, and seeking help from a union.
  • Strike and picket, depending on the purpose or means of the strike or the picketing.
  • Choose not to do any of these activities, including joining or remaining a member of a union.

The notice also advises employees that it is illegal for their employer to:

  • Prohibit them from talking about or soliciting for a union during non-work time, such as before or after work or during break times; or from distributing union literature during non-work time, in non-work areas, such as parking lots or break rooms.
  • Question them about their union support or activities in a manner that discourages them from engaging in that activity.
  • Fire, demote, or transfer them, or reduce their hours or change their shifts, or otherwise take adverse action against them, or threaten to take any of these actions, because they join or support a union, or because they engage in concerted activity for mutual aid and protection, or because they choose not to engage in any such activity.
  • Threaten to close their workplace if workers choose a union to represent them.
  • Promise or grant promotions, pay raises, or other benefits to discourage or encourage union support.
  • Prohibit them from wearing union hats, buttons, t-shirts, and pins in the workplace except under special circumstances.
  • Spy on or videotape peaceful union activities and gatherings or pretend to do so.

The new notice rule is another in a string of recent attempts by the NLRB to advance the cause of organized labor through rulings and rulemaking. Employers who have grown accustomed to settled NLRB rules should not assume that the current NLRB will abide by its prior decisions and that, given the opportunity, it is likely to interpret them in favor of organized labor.

The Form of Notice can be found here:
Employee Rights Under the National Labor Relations Act

This is Jim Butler, author of www.HotelLawBlog.com and hotel lawyer, signing off. We’ve done more than $60 billion of hotel transactions and have developed innovative solutions to unlock value from hotels. Who’s your hotel lawyer?
________________________
Brink_S-024_Bio.jpgScott Brink is a senior member of JMBM’s Global Hospitality Group® and a partner in JMBM’s Labor & Employment Law Department. Scott is a management labor lawyer with more than two decades of experience representing employers in all aspects of labor relations and employment law including union prevention, collective bargaining negotiations, defense of unfair labor practice charges before the NLRB, wrongful discharge litigation, individual and class action employment discrimination and wage-and-hour claims, sexual-harassment litigation, arbitrations, personnel policies, California wage and hour law, and employee discipline and discharge. An experienced trial attorney, Scott has litigated a number of high-profile and complex cases involving a wide range of labor and employment law matters. For more information, contact Scott Brink at RSB@jmbm.com or +1 (310) 785-5365.

________________________
Our Perspective. We represent hotel lenders, owners and investors. We have helped our clients find business and legal solutions for more than $60 billion of hotel transactions, involving more than 1,300 properties all over the world. For more information, please contact Jim Butler at jbutler@jmbm.com or +1 (310) 201-3526.

Jim Butler is a founding partner of JMBM, and Chairman of its Global Hospitality Group® and Chinese Investment Group™. Jim is one of the top hospitality attorneys in the world. GOOGLE “hotel lawyer” and you will see why.

Jim and his team are more than “just” great hotel lawyers. They are also hospitality consultants and business advisors. They are deal makers. They can help find the right operator or capital provider. They know who to call and how to reach them.