New "tipping" rules for 2014: Are you ready?
For the most recent update on this topic, click here
By Jim Butler and the Global Hospitality Group®
Hotel Lawyers | Authors of www.HotelLawBlog.com
10 November 2013
Hotel Lawyer with some tips for employers on handling tipping -- the new IRS Rules.
Employer practices with tips at hotels and restaurants have spawned a lot of employee discontent, class actions and other litigation. Some employers have withheld all or a portion of employee tips to cover administrative costs and others have redistributed tips amongst employees, some of whom (like bus staff and kitchen crews) have no opportunity to earn tips. Even the IRS has gotten into the game by adopting new rules that go into effect in January 2014.
The latest development centers around the common practice for restaurants, hotels, and others in the hospitality industry to impose "mandatory gratuities" to large parties of patrons. (We're all familiar with those menus that read, "A gratuity of 18% will be charged for parties over 6.") While there may be legitimate reasons for this practice, the potential liability for mishandling automatic gratuities is significant, and about to get much bigger.
Plaintiffs have been fairly successful in arguing that such mandatory gratuities or service charges are compensation for employees, all of which must be paid to the employees, which may not be distributed to non-tipable employees, and are probably subject to employer reporting and withholding taxes, and are part of employees' regular rates of pay for overtime calculation purposes.
But now the IRS is promulgating some rules that go into effect in 2014, and all employers should pay attention. My partner, hospitality employment lawyer Travis Gemoets, gives us the full story.
Change in IRS Rules on "Automatic Tipping"
Raises a red flag for hotels & restaurants
One of the many new laws going into effect in 2014 will require hotels, restaurants and other employers in the hospitality industry to change their current practice when employees are paid "automatic" tips charged to large groups of patrons. This ruling will not only effect tax withholding, but also require employers to make additional overtime payments to the employees, above and beyond the automatic tip charged to the customer.
Current law requires employees to report their monthly cash "tips" (provided they received $20 or more in the month) to their employer no later than 10 days after the end of the month. Employers are required by law to collect income and payroll tax on these tips as reported by the employee. Cash tips are defined to include tips received directly from customers by cash, credit card or debit card; tips collected and distributed to an employee by an employer; and tips received through a "tip sharing" agreement. The employer is not responsible to withhold employee payroll taxes on unreported tips until a notice and demand is made from the IRS.
The new Rules for 2014
But a new obligation goes into effect on January 1, 2014, affecting all payments made after 2013. The IRS recently issued Rev. Rul. 2012-18 (the "Ruling") to address an employer's tax withholding and reporting of "mandatory tips." Mandatory tips are commonly imposed by restaurants for large parties, and often the menu itself will advise patrons that "an 18 % gratuity will automatically be applied on parties of 6 or more."
Unlike tips that subject the employer to tax withholding and reporting obligations only to the extent disclosed by the employee, the Ruling clarifies that automatic gratuities are not "tips" under the law, but rather service charge wages. It is the employer's responsibility to monitor and track all service charge wages, including the obligation to withhold on these wages and report them to the IRS. The employee's monthly tip reporting obligations simply don't apply to these mandatory tips/service charges.
Tips vs. Wages
The Ruling states whether a payment is a tip or a service charge wage is a factual determination, but absent one of the following criteria the payment likely is characterized as a wage (rather than a tip): (i) the customer's payment must be made free from compulsion; (ii) the customer must have the unrestricted right to determine the amount; (iii) the payment should not be the subject of negotiation or dictated by employer policy; and (iv) generally, the customer has the right to determine who receives the payment.
The Ruling gives an example where a restaurant imposes a mandatory 18 percent charge for parties of six or more. In this instance, the customer is not free to pay more or less than the mandatory amount. The Ruling concludes the amount is a "service charge" and thus a "wage" for federal tax withholding and reporting purposes, provided the restaurant distributes the 18 percent charge to employees. Conversely, if the restaurant merely includes sample tip amounts on the bill, and the tip line is left blank, the amount the customer adds to the bill is considered a "tip" for federal tax purposes.
Other legal consequences of payments being "wages"
But the tax consequence is only one facet on how the Ruling will affect employers in the Hospitality industry. Once the "tip" is designated as a "mandatory tip", it becomes part of the employee's wages paid by the employer. This will affect the employee's rate of pay since, as wages, mandatory tips must be included into the regular rate of pay for hourly employees unless a basis for exclusion can be found in the Fair Labor Standards Act (the "FLSA").
If these mandatory tip amounts are not incorporated into the employee's hourly rate pursuant to formulas set forth in the FLSA, the employee's overtime wages will be calculated incorrectly, resulting in an underpayment of wages to the employee. And, to make matters worse, the Ruling may be new, but the obligations under the FLSA are not. We are seeing an increase in class actions alleging the improper failure to include service charges and "mandatory gratuities" into the calculation of employees' regular rate of pay.
Moreover, the US Department of Labor ("DOL") is currently targeting the restaurant industry and we are seeing an increased numbers of investigations across the United States. For these reason, failure to comply with the Ruling may subject a restaurant employer to intense scrutiny not only by the IRS, but also by the DOL and plaintiffs' attorneys.
The federal investigation or class action lawsuit may expand beyond the scope of the Ruling into many wage and hour areas, including minimum wage and overtime classification, and the penalties for any underpayment can include the amount of the unpaid wages, an equal amount in liquidated damages, plus interest and attorneys' fees. State laws pertaining to the non-payment of wages can compound the employer's liability.
What should employers do?
The Ruling highlights the significant risks facing any business that has been treating "automatic gratuities" as tips rather than wages. The New York Times recently reported that a number of restaurants are dropping mandatory tips and service charges. Some are increasing the prices of food to compensate.
In any event, employers should review their reporting practices and payroll calculations regarding mandatory tips and/or service charges. A discussion with qualified legal counsel may be warranted, since the requirements in this area are very complicated, and certain exemptions set forth in the FLSA may apply.
Travis Gemoets is an experienced trial attorney and represents management in all facets of labor and employment law, including wage/hour class actions, claims of discrimination, harassment, wrongful termination, trade secrets and unfair competition, union/management relations and workplace violence. He is a member of JMBM's Global Hospitality Group®, in which capacity he negotiates union contracts and resolves labor disputes throughout the country, defends class action claims, develops strategies for the mass onboarding and separation of employees, and recommends proactive changes to employers' policies and practices in order to minimize potential liability risks. Reach him at 310.785.5387 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
This is Jim Butler, author of www.HotelLawBlog.com and hotel lawyer, signing off. We've done more than $60 billion of hotel transactions and have developed innovative solutions to unlock value from hotels. Who's your hotel lawyer?
Our Perspective. We represent hotel lenders, owners and investors. We have helped our clients find business and legal solutions for more than $60 billion of hotel transactions, involving more than 1,300 properties all over the world. For more information, please contact Jim Butler at email@example.com or +1 (310) 201-3526.
Jim Butler is a founding partner of JMBM, and Chairman of its Global Hospitality Group® and Chinese Investment Group™. Jim is one of the top hospitality attorneys in the world. GOOGLE "hotel lawyer" and you will see why.
Jim and his team are more than "just" great hotel lawyers. They are also hospitality consultants and business advisors. They are deal makers. They can help find the right operator or capital provider. They know who to call and how to reach them.