Hotel Lawyer: New Federal Junk Fee Law – The No Hidden FEES Act of 2023 (HR 6543)

13 June 2024
See how JMBM’s Global Hospitality Group® can help you.
Click here for the latest articles on Junk Fee Litigation.

Note: If you are a consumer with a Junk Fee issue, please do NOT contact us! We do not represent consumers against hotels, restaurants, or other business owners. We are part of the fabric of the hospitality industry and are committed to informing, educating, and assisting the industry. We represent business owners, helping them to understand and comply with applicable laws and defending them from consumer charges.

HR 6543: The US Congress wants in on Junk Fee regulation for hotels

Over the past several weeks, we have written about recent major regulatory developments concerning Junk Fees, Hidden Fees, and Drip Pricing:

• California’s SB 478, The California Junk Fee Law, Honest Pricing Law, Transparent Pricing Law or Hidden Fees Statute
• California’s proposed SB 1524, which will carve out an exception for the restaurant industry from the application of SB 478, and an update on its
• FTC’s proposed rule on Unfair or Deceptive Fees, adding Part 464 to 16 CFR, defining junk fees and drip pricing to be unfair or deceptive acts or practices under Section 5(a)(1) of the FTC Act (15 U.S.C. 45(a)(1)

We now turn our attention to the very latest – the Federal proposed “No Hidden FEES Act of 2023”.

The House passes HR 6543 and enters the ring to regulate Junk Fees
for hotels and short-term lodging

by

Mark S. Adams
Hotel Dispute Lawyer, Partner & Senior Member
JMBM’s Global Hospitality Group

On June 11, 2024, the United States House of Representatives passed HR 6543, the so-called “No Hidden FEES Act of 2023” which introduces federal regulations aimed at enhancing transparency and fairness in the advertising of hotel room and short-term lodging prices. A critical component of this Act is its preemption clause, found in Section 4(a), which establishes a national standard prohibiting states from enforcing any laws that conflict with the federal mandate. This provision has significant implications for state regulations, such as California’s SB 478, which also aims to protect consumers from hidden fees in various transactions. The scope and application of this preemption clause are essential for assessing how state laws will be affected and ensuring compliance with the new federal standards.

Below, we compare the No Hidden FEES Act of 2023 to the Proposed FTC Rule on Junk Fees and California’s SB 478:

Aspect	No Hidden FEES Act of 2023	Proposed FTC Rule on Junk Fees	California’s SB 478
Scope and Focus	Targets hotel rooms and other short-term lodging.	Broad scope targeting various industries (e.g., events, rental cars).	Focuses on hidden fees in consumer transactions, including internet service, tickets, and more.
	Prohibits advertising lodging prices that exclude mandatory fees.	Addresses a wide range of hidden fees added at the end of transactions.	Requires upfront disclosure of all mandatory fees in advertised prices.
	Focuses on transparency in the lodging industry.	Ensures upfront disclosure of all mandatory fees across multiple sectors.	Aims to enhance transparency and protect consumers from deceptive pricing practices.
Enforcement Mechanisms	Enforced by the FTC, treating violations as breaches of the FTC Act.	Enforced by the FTC under its mandate against unfair/deceptive practices.	Enforced by the California Attorney General and local district attorneys.
	State attorneys general can bring civil actions with FTC notification.	Similar enforcement mechanisms to other FTC regulations (investigations, fines).	Allows for civil penalties and enforcement actions at the state level.
	Provides for state-level enforcement within a unified federal standard.	May include provisions for consumer restitution and corrective measures.	Focuses on state-level enforcement to protect California consumers.
Specific Provisions	Defines terms like “mandatory fee” and “covered provider.”	Likely to include industry-specific definitions and requirements.	Defines “mandatory fee” and requires clear disclosure in advertisements.
	Allows display of individual price components if the total price is clear.	Emphasizes upfront disclosure in all advertising and marketing materials.	Mandates that the advertised price must include all mandatory fees.
	Establishes a one-year timeline for the Act to take effect.	Implementation details and timelines may vary by industry.	Effective from January 1, 2023.
Similarities	Enhances pricing transparency and protects consumers from deceptive practices.	Aims to prevent hidden fees and ensure consumers understand total costs.	Seeks to prevent hidden fees and ensure clear pricing for consumers.
	Enforced by the FTC with provisions for state enforcement.	Requires upfront disclosure of all mandatory fees.	Enforces clear and upfront pricing for all mandatory fees.
Differences	Focused specifically on the lodging industry.	Broader focus across multiple sectors.	Focused on a wide range of consumer transactions within California.
	Specific state enforcement provisions and lodging-related definitions.	Varied implementation details depending on sector.	State-specific law with enforcement at the state level.
Preemption	Establishes a national standard, potentially preempting conflicting state laws.	Could potentially conflict with state regulations depending on scope.	State law; may be preempted by the No Hidden FEES Act of 2023 if it establishes a national standard.

Preemption of SB 478 will be an issue if the No Hidden FEES Act of 2023 is enacted.  As noted above,  the “No Hidden FEES Act of 2023” would establish a national standard for advertising hotel room and short-term lodging prices. This national standard could preempt California’s SB 478 to the extent that SB 478 conflicts with federal law. Specifically, Section 4(a) of the No Hidden FEES Act of 2023 prohibits states from maintaining or enforcing laws that contradict the Act’s provisions on price advertising for short-term lodging. However, SB 478 might still apply to other types of transactions not covered by the federal Act, such as internet services and event tickets, unless explicitly preempted by other federal regulations.

 

For more recent articles written by Mark S. Adams, please see the following links:

California’s AB 537 mandates transparent pricing for all short-term lodging as of July 1, 2024 — $10,000 penalty for violation

New Federal Junk Fee Law – The No Hidden FEES Act of 2023 (HR 6543)

Jim Butler asks Mark S. Adams for update on California Junk Fee law: Would SB 1524 gut SB 478’s honest pricing for all?

Pricing transparency without hidden mandatory junk fees. Does this apply to restaurants too? New California proposed law (SB 1524 ) says “No!” Can this be right?

FTC’s proposed rule will end drip pricing and junk fees for hotels, restaurants, and many other businesses. Goodbye to resort fees, destination fees, service charges and other miscellaneous fees?

California bans Junk Fees as of July 1, 2024. Good bye to junk fees, resort fees, mandatory service charges, and drip pricing. Hello to – the fruits of SB 478.

Disclosing Mandatory Resort Fees – What Hoteliers Need to Know

Why Judicial Reference is better than Arbitration for resolving Hotel Management Agreements & Hotel Franchise Agreements. Advanced Analysis of Judicial Reference features.

The better way to resolve hotel contract disputes: Judicial Reference or Arbitration? 

What’s best for hospitality contract dispute clauses? Arbitration, court litigation, or judicial reference in hotel management and franchise agreements?

Should New York law govern your hospitality contract? How about Texas, California or Florida law?

Meet Mark S. Adams, Hotel Dispute Lawyer – Hospitality Litigation, Arbitration & Dispute Resolution

How Pennsylvania Resort Fees Settlements Could Play Out for US Hotel Industry

Force Majeure – Contract provisions and governing law are important

History & origins of Force Majeure as a contract defense

JMBM’s Global Hospitality Group® announces 5th edition of The HMA & Franchise Agreement Handbook

Hotel Lawyer on HMAs: “The shrinking terms of hotel management agreements”

Losing the expectation of privacy bit by bit, byte by byte

---

This is Jim Butler, author of www.HotelLawBlog.com and founding partner of JMBM and JMBM’s Global Hospitality Group®. We provide business and legal advice to hotel owners, developers, independent operators, and investors. This advice covers critical hotel issues such as hotel purchase, sale, development, financing, franchise, management, ADA, and IP matters. We also have compelling experience in hotel litigation, union avoidance and union negotiations, and cybersecurity & data privacy.

JMBM’s Global Hospitality Group® has been involved in more than $125 billion of hotel transactions and more than 4,700 hotel properties located around the globe. Contact me at +1-310-201-3526 or jbutler@jmbm.com to discuss how we can help.

---

How can we help? Brochure Credentials Photo Gallery